![]() |
CESNUR Objects to Inclusion of Letter |
![]() ![]() |
![]() |
CESNUR Objects to Inclusion of Letter
For the background behind this story, start at this page.
![]()
I have received an email from CESNUR telling me that a complaint has been
filed with the Turin City Prosecutor against the recipient of the letter
reproduced on the Internet by "Comments from the Friends":
and by the Apologetics Index (my site):
In that letter CESNUR's Massimo Introvigne explains that while all of the Jehovah's Witnesses who did not participate in CESNUR's recent conference
had sent messages stating they could not come for private reasons,
"lawyers knowledgable with their matters" told him the Watchtower
headquarters were concerned because of information made public by
"Comments From The Friends." The recipient sent a copy of the letter to
"Comments From The Friends."
CESNUR's email to me states that in Italy there is no "fair use doctrine
protecting unauthorized reproduction of private correspondence." Mr.
Introvigne considers this a "copyright violation," and says both instances
are criminal felonies under Italian law. He added "My lawyers will be
happy to add your name to the case." This, he writes, will be done
without further notice if the letter is still on my web site by the end of
the business day, December 23rd (Wednesday).
My legal contacts in Holland all consider this an interesting case. Some think CESNUR is doing itself a disservice, and several point out that real or implied threats to remove a web page tend to backfire in the form of
mirrored pages, negative publicity and closer scrutiny.
I, for one, would like to know whether, as Mr. Introvigne says, all of the
Jehovah's Witnesses cancelled their participation in the CESNUR 1998
conference for
If the latter, who are the "lawyers knowledgable with their matters" Mr.
Introvigne refers to?
Did - as CESNUR representative and lawyher Michael Homer writes - CFTF try
to intimidate the Jehovah's Witnesses by publicising their involvement
in the conference? Did, as he claims, CESNUR, its directors and its
officers suffer damages? If so, how?
CESNUR should understand this: as long as it, its directors, and its
officers act as pro-cult apologists, there will be no end of people and
organizations ready of expose it to daylight.
Legal professionals will advise me on a course of action by tomorrow
afternoon (December 23). Meanwhile, the page in question
http://www.apologeticsindex.org/j04.html
will remain online at least until the close of business - 6:00 PM CET - Wednesday, December 23rd, 1998 (CESNUR's deadline).
See also:
CESNUR Threatens CFTF - background
http://www.apologeticsindex.org/j03.html CESNUR's explanation (the letter referred to above) http://www.apologeticsindex.org/j04.html the lawyer's letter to CFTF (the lawyer also happens to work as "CESNUR U.S.A., Utah") http://www.apologeticsindex.org/j05.html and the "Comments From The Friends" follow-up http://www.apologeticsindex.org/j06.html
For more about CESNUR, see:
About CESNUR
http://www.apologeticsindex.org/c10.html For more about Cult Apologists, see
About Cult Apologists
http://www.apologeticsindex.org/c11.html Anton Hein
|